Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 72857 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2001 22:12:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 72697 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2001 22:12:08 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:15:46 -0800 (PST) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Beta Status. :-) In-Reply-To: <3A5E2CED.FA6E9F1A@raleigh.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > Run the script locally (heck, that is where the logs are). That should > > provide some information about the server's stability. > > > > hmmmmm...but couldn't we stress a _replica_ of apache.org elsewhere, > using 2.0 and port 80? We might be able to shake out other bugs. It's > been useful in my past life. > > That said, if the replica has to have jakarta, it might be more > complicated to create the replica that I thought. Or maybe we could > ignore jakarta for Stress Test 0.1 and see if we can shake out anything. I already have this on my Celeron 400 machine. I am doing it. The machine is a laptop, and it isn't usually connected to a network, so I can't offer accounts, but I am doing this. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------