Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 89779 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2001 19:05:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 89768 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2001 19:05:48 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:06:25 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Behlendorf X-Sender: brian@localhost To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: beta? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 rbb@covalent.net wrote: > I understand that, but remember, that these features, and things that > people said we couldn't go beta without. Dean and Bill said we couldn't > go beta with the ap_r* performance we had. We absolutely can't go beta > with seg faults whenever we make byterange requests. I would prefer if we > didn't go beta if people can't write useful modules. Personally, I would prefer to be running a threaded mpm on apache.org before going beta, and a useful mod_status output, but I won't push it. Brian