Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 41025 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2001 01:07:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 41001 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2001 01:07:05 -0000 Sender: jesus Message-ID: <3A5BB5BC.D6B8801B@omniti.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 20:06:46 -0500 From: "Theo E. Schlossnagle" Organization: Center for Networking and Distributed Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Beta Status. :-) References: <3A5B7ABD.51C03282@Golux.Com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N I wrote something to do almost exactly what you are saying. It will not automatically compare the events to the old log, but it will replay whatever you like. It is called daiquiri, I briefly mentioned it at my talk in Europe. There is a cvs snapshot tarball at http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/projects/ Should take about 5 minutes to get it running... Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Greg brought up the idea of using the apache.org access logs > to run a replay test against the 2.0 server. Probably a Perl > script that extracts the URI, status, and size from the logfile, > and then makes the request against the 8092 server (or a > mirrored environment somewhere else). When the replay gives > the same results, happiness. > > Thoughts? And if you mention Python, Greg, I shall be pleased > to thump you on the head. :-) -- Theo Schlossnagle 1024D/A8EBCF8F/13BD 8C08 6BE2 629A 527E 2DC2 72C2 AD05 A8EB CF8F 2047R/33131B65/71 F7 95 64 49 76 5D BA 3D 90 B9 9F BE 27 24 E7