Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 15767 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2001 12:58:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 15754 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2001 12:58:32 -0000 Message-ID: <3A51D059.F10ABD45@algroup.co.uk> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 12:58:01 +0000 From: Ben Laurie X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Typesafe generic hooks - done! References: <3A50BCB4.66C9EA56@algroup.co.uk> <20010101230043.B500@mana.ebuilt.com> <3A51B76A.CBE3F573@algroup.co.uk> <20010102032633.A10567@lyra.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Greg Stein wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:11:38AM +0000, Ben Laurie wrote: > > "Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > > > > > > Please use the Apache style, and lose the hungarian accent. > > > > OK, and why should I? > > Because you're playing in the sandbox with other people. To play nice, your > code should be similar. If it is too different, then it is much more > difficult for us to jump in and help maintain/update/change the code. > > I'm sure you're aware, but to be obvious: in a group dev effort, consistency > of coding style is very important. The actual style is pretty moot, but the > consistent application is necessary. Well, we do have a style guide for this very reason. Which I'm happy to follow, even though I do forget sometimes. > So Roy is saying, "play nice". I agree. I'm more than happy to play nice, but there is no discernable style to internal variable names in Apache. I know that some people have some weird religious objection to Hungarian, but I'm an atheist. I object to names that don't give you any clue what the variable holds, but the Apache code is rife with them. I find it hard to believe that calling a variable "szStr" instead of "str" is going to present a significant barrier to maintenance for anyone! Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff