Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 85102 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2001 19:24:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 85089 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2001 19:24:54 -0000 Message-ID: <3A50D96F.E09D5FFE@algroup.co.uk> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 19:24:31 +0000 From: Ben Laurie X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org CC: httpd-2.0-cvs@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support htdigest.c htpasswd.c References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N rbb@covalent.net wrote: > > > > > > -exports.c: $(EXPORT_FILES) > > > > > - (cat $(EXPORT_FILES) | ../build/buildexports.sh ../srclib) > $@ > > > > > +delete-exports: > > > > > + @if test -f $(TARGET_EXPORTS); then \ > > > > > + headers="`find include/*.h -newer $(TARGET_EXPORTS)`" ; \ > > > > > + if test -n "$$headers"; then \ > > > > > + echo Found newer headers. Will rebuild $(TARGET_EXPORTS). ; \ > > > > > + echo $(RM) -f $(TARGET_EXPORTS) ; \ > > > > > > > > RM is not defined for me (and I suspect not for anyone else) in > > > > config_vars.mk, so touching a header file breaks the build. > > > > > > I'll fix the RM issue now. > > > > You'll have noticed that he didn't (but I did, by changing it to rm). > > Actually, I thought I did. ARGH! I added the check in configure.in, but > it wasn't added to config_vars. :-( Why do you want to check for rm? Surely it can't be missing - and what would you use in its place if it were? Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff