Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 54530 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2001 01:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 54519 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 01:31:34 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200101090131.UAA04622@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: NO_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT? To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:31:39 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: <20010108222907.O11830@hand.dotat.at> from "Tony Finch" at Jan 08, 2001 10:29:07 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Uh oh. This means we need to worry about where in 4.2-STABLE it's robust... Unless we just tank all of 4.2 Tony Finch wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >But it appears that it might be all FreeBSD versions below 4.1 which > >cause it. > > No, it's up to and including 4.2-RELEASE. > > Tony. > -- > f.a.n.finch fanf@covalent.net dot@dotat.at > "If I didn't see it with my own eyes I would never have believed it!" > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will have to have more than forks and flatulence."