Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 8907 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2001 12:59:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 8896 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2001 12:59:16 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: kurgan.lyra.org: gstein set sender to gstein@lyra.org using -f Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 04:58:44 -0800 From: Greg Stein To: new-httpd@apache.org, jim@jaguNET.com Subject: Re: NO_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT? Message-ID: <20010108045844.Z17220@lyra.org> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org, jim@jaguNET.com References: <20010107235725.W17220@lyra.org> <200101081240.HAA27702@devsys.jaguNET.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200101081240.HAA27702@devsys.jaguNET.com>; from jim@jaguNET.com on Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:40:31AM -0500 X-URL: http://www.lyra.org/greg/ X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:40:31AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: > > > > > > > > We were talking about keeping the 'sed' stuff... > > > > I don't understand why... isn't the shell's "case" statement simpler? > > > > Yep, that's why I suggested it. But it appears that it might be > all FreeBSD versions below 4.1 which cause it. So the full > case would be: > > 1*|2*|3*|4.0*) > > As Marc said, however, the key is that we don't know *what* the > deal is with FreeBSD threads and what versions are OK, nor if > it's just how we use them. True, but that is orthogonal to simplifying the tests using case globbing. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/