Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <200101071808.NAA19490@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: NO_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT?
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 13:08:07 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101071002520.17292-100000@koj> from
 "rbb@covalent.net" at Jan 07, 2001 10:03:35 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The below patch would, unfortunately, also hit FreeBSD 3.4 as well,
which I think works OK...

How about:

  case "$OS" in
    *freebsd*)
       case `uname -r` in
          3.2*)
	    blah blah

Also easier to expand upon if need be later on I'm thinking.

rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> 
> 
> Logically, this should complain loudly, and stop the compile.  Can
> somebody test this?
> 
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.205
> diff -u -d -b -w -u -r1.205 configure.in
> --- configure.in        2001/01/05 22:33:08     1.205
> +++ configure.in        2001/01/07 17:59:10
> @@ -565,6 +565,17 @@
>      fi
>  fi
> 
> +if test "$threads" = "1"; then
> +    case "$OS" in
> +        *freebsd*)
> +            if test `uname -r | sed -e 's/\(.\)\.\(.\)\..*/\1\2/'` -le
> "41"; then
> +                AC_MSG_ERROR([You have tried to Enable threads on a
> platform that we does not support them well enough to run APR in threaded
> mode.  To continue, you must remove this message from configure.in and
> re-run buildconf.])
> +            fi
> +            ;;
> +        *) ;;
> +    esac
> +fi
> +
>  if test "$pthreadh" = "1"; then
>      APR_CHECK_PTHREAD_GETSPECIFIC_TWO_ARGS
>      APR_CHECK_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETDETACHSTATE_ONE_ARG
> 
> 
> Ryan
> 
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Ben Laurie wrote:
> 
> > rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> > > 
> > > Take a look at hints.m4.  That's where we should have defined values like
> > > this in 2.0.  I'm not sure that NO_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT is used anywhere, but
> > > I haven't checked.
> > 
> > Actually, it seems that threading and FreeBSD 3.2 just don't get on too
> > well. I'm going to give up and use prefork instead...
> > 
> > Didn't we know this already? Is there some way to make things complain
> > if we try to do this?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Ben.
> > 
> > --
> > http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
> > 
> > "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
> > doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
          "Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will
              have to have more than forks and flatulence."