Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 39932 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2001 07:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 39921 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2001 07:22:19 -0000 Errors-To: Message-ID: <02e101c0761f$17f01e50$96c0b0d0@roweclan.net> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: "dmw" , References: <3A29D086.126C5A19@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: DEC Alpha Windows NT port of Apache 1.3.14 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:22:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N First, if you have MSVC, I'd suggesting building the Apache.dsw project instead (you may want to check the files out of the anonomous cvs repository, instructions at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ since that version is more closely coupled to win32. If you want to pursue gcc... look at the www.cygwin.org project, which has a patch to build apache using the cygwin compatibility thunk. Good luck, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "dmw" To: Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 10:48 PM Subject: DEC Alpha Windows NT port of Apache 1.3.14 > > Hello, > > I may have ported Apache 1.3.14 to (DEC) Alpha Windows NT. I just got it > running today, anyway. It seems to work fine (Netscape from my other machines > explores the manual OK), except that images aren't being forwarded to the > browser (it keeps trying and never times out). I used the native Alpha NT gcc281 > compiler and unix utilities that I got from: http://www.guiduck.com/gcc281.zip , > and let the configure script not grok me and assume a default unix. Very minimal > hacking was needed. > > I'm wondering if someone could point me in a direction to solve the image problem? > > Sincerely, > Martin > > >