Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 71743 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2001 17:03:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 71643 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2001 17:03:52 -0000 Message-ID: <016001c07738$f4e70a70$011aa8c0@godzilla> From: "David Reid" To: "Apache \(new-httpd\)" Subject: Ordering of config files... Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:59:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N How close are we to this? I've just found out that if you don't specify an MPM on the command line then you can't build on beos as the beos section is included before MPM_NAME is set and so no Makefile is generated! I can change the test to use APACHE_MPM but is this the correct way of doing it or shoudl we be able to order these correctly without? The patch would be something like and does solve the problem... Index: server/mpm/beos/config.m4 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/beos/config.m4,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 config.m4 --- server/mpm/beos/config.m4 2000/12/04 22:33:45 1.3 +++ server/mpm/beos/config.m4 2001/01/05 16:20:06 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ dnl ## XXX - Need a more thorough check of the proper flags to use -if test "$MPM_NAME" = "beos" ; then +if test "$APACHE_MPM" = "beos" ; then apache_apr_flags="--enable-threads" - APACHE_FAST_OUTPUT(server/mpm/$MPM_NAME/Makefile) + APACHE_FAST_OUTPUT(server/mpm/$APACHE_MPM/Makefile) fi david