Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 92743 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2001 22:29:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 92690 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2001 22:29:45 -0000 Message-ID: <006801c07d7c$9101b9c0$0100007f@localhost> From: "jlwpc1" To: References: <000b01c07cef$9b3825b0$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> <02be01c07d0b$0178a550$94c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Subject: Re: awk -- Can't win for loosing Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:52:10 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:46 PM Subject: Re: awk -- Can't win for loosing > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 5:30 PM >=20 > > Folks, > >=20 > > I'm prepared to include the sources and build awk as part > > of the danged apache build if we can't find a solution to these > > issues. I propose we add helpers/awk and drop in the AT&T/Lucient > > licensed code as-is, build it as part of the makefile.win build > > before we rewrite files. > >=20 > > It is an absolute joke that some windows shells aren't accepting > > slashes (quoted, mind you) in file names, while it's an equal joke > > that gnu awk won't accept backslashed names. > >=20 > > I have no other good answer. Ideas? Back to perl scripts? >=20 > The damage is done, we've reverted to the working mechanism for > the one true awk, and now diss the gnu awk. Questions now for > gnu awk users... >=20 > I'm suspecting that awk is ignorning the -f foo flag and solo > BEGIN block? Though that's supposed to tell awk that no files > are expected, I'm guessing gnu awk is broken in this respect. >=20 > Please download, with the properly quoted arguments, and let > me know what you see. >=20 >=20 >=20 LOL :) I told Apache "developers" this would bite them! =20 For those that wish to do the make files awk "actions" and do this = "cleanly", (by learning the Windows OS and the Windows OS tools), so you can "develop", then go to the following: http://msdn.microsoft.com/scripting/ Then throw awk away and CScript.exe it - available on ALL Windows OSes, (except for the Apache "developers" computers)! :) JLW