Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 19344 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2001 13:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 19333 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2001 13:57:13 -0000 Errors-To: From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: Subject: RE: Possible breakage in 1.3.15 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 07:57:23 -0600 Message-ID: <001601c08544$695655f0$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <20010123092513.J92905@hand.dotat.at> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Tony Finch [mailto:dot@dotat.at] > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:25 AM > > Tony Finch wrote: > >Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > >> > >>I have only noticed this in 1.5.15-dev and later; I am not sure > >>whether it was in earlier versions or not, and I am writing > >>this on a plane w/o access to the webcvs stuff. > > > >Oh bollocks, I broke fix_hostname. Fix imminent. > > Can I commit this, Jim? Of course you may, we are in 1.3.17-dev. The question is, do we toss this tarball and roll again? I'm +1 for killing 1.3.16 over this specific issue. Bill