Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 29371 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2001 17:49:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 29246 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2001 17:49:42 -0000 Errors-To: From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: Subject: RE: Both ap_r* patches. Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:49:43 -0600 Message-ID: <000a01c08240$39970410$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <00e701c0823f$4959b420$e4421b09@raleigh.ibm.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:bill@wstoddard.com] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 11:43 AM > > I was being facetious. The performance still sucks, just much MUCH less so. > Has to do with the Windows code more than anything else now. Ack. You are probably hurting both ways, in ab, and in httpd. I'm working on the file system as we speak, specifically apr_stat, and then returning to the core file processing. No canonical today, I'm working from the objective of keeping the code flow where it is now, and extending apr_stat to tell us what we need with the fewest cycles and smallest number of calls, and sharing the code path with Unix.