httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@covalent.net
Subject Re: [PATCH] ap_r* performance patch
Date Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:53:08 GMT

> > A few comments before I review in great detail.  The actual numbers (2 vs
> > 3.5) can't be compared here.  I used a 4K buffer while you used a 9KK
> > buffer.  That means I always had one more allocation than you do.  Not a
> > big deal, but it is there.
> 
> Agreed. I just had to throw it out, though :-)  It is entirely conceivable
> that your patch would be a 4x on my box. *shrug*  Maybe Greg Ames will do a
> comparison of the different patches.

I am actually about to run a test on your patch, my patch, and the current
2.0.  Along with that, I will be generating strace's, and comparing them.

> I hope the post explains it well enough, but just ask if something is
> unclear.

This is definately very different from what I had envisioned given your
explanation.  I really need to spend a lot more time looking at it, but
that will have to come later tonight.  :-)

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message