httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Marr <gr...@alum.wpi.edu>
Subject Re: the ap_r* thing (was: Re: Apache 2.0 beta STATUS)
Date Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:34:43 GMT
At 02:17 PM 01/22/2001, Greg Stein wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 02:10:44PM -0500, Greg Marr wrote:
> > At 01:51 PM 01/22/2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:16:23PM -0500, Greg Marr wrote:
> > > > At 06:36 AM 01/22/2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > >An answer is to tell everybody "you must use r->bb, and 
> never your
> > > > >own brigade."
> > > >
> > > > A better answer is to tell people to ap_rflush() before calling
> > > > functions they don't control that may generate output, and to 
> call
> > > > ap_rflush after generating output using ap_r* if the function 
> may be
> > > > called by functions they don't control.
> > >
> > >This would be inadvisable.  ap_rflush() will deliver to the
> > >network.  The hope is to synchronize the ordering, rather than
> > >generate network packets :-)
> >
> > Okay, so I guess that apr_brigade_flush() would be a better call 
> to
> > use, but that does bring up the question I had in my other 
> message.  :)
>
>Which question? It's hard to keep track, and I read all this stuff. 
>Our audience viewers could be even more confused :-)

Sorry, whether to use ap_rflush or apr_brigade_flush() in any given 
circumstance.

-- 
Greg Marr
gregm@alum.wpi.edu
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"


Mime
View raw message