httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Just noticed...
Date Thu, 25 Jan 2001 02:21:51 GMT
For the alpha cycle, yes, we decided to forgo the .mak files.  They were built
immediately before we expected to launch the first beta.

Nuke them from the tree if you like, we can resussetate them right before
we roll each tree.

The problem is - if you don't built the projects, you can't effectively build
the dependencies to export the make files.  That is, there are hidden dependencies
that are only 'revealed' on a build (dropping in config.h files all about.)
So the convoluted sequence becomes:

1. build the InstallBin project from the .dsp's.
2. export the make files from the .dsp's

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:54 PM
Subject: Just noticed...


> The windows make files are in the source tree.  This is rather annoying when I
> do a cvs diff -u from the top of the tree (or a cvs commit from the top) as
> the makefiles are no longer kept up to date. Can we either keep the files up
> to date or nuke them completely (which is what I though we decided to do for
> 2.0 anyway)
> 
> Bill
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message