httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: Canonical Names in 2.0
Date Fri, 05 Jan 2001 23:38:23 GMT
I've said it before (and I'm saying it again) but I think we should wait
until Bill's done on this stuff before we go beta.  His stuff will mean a
fair few changes and we want to be sure it all works as expected before we
go beta.

If Bill's got a timeline we could always set a date to aim at now that we
seem to be resolving the other issues.  This should give us time to hammer
it and run it on apache for a period to make sure we're happy.

Just my 2p again...

david

----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: RE: Canonical Names in 2.0


>
> I'm writing the unified canonical stuff from scratch,
> it's my project for next week (back to 2.0 :-) so I'll
> be on it and pay attention for pool issues.
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:04 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Canonical Names in 2.0
>
>
>
> I have just taken a very quick look at the canonical names stuff, and it
> looks liike we can stop using pstrdup in some cases, but I'm not really
> sure.  Could somebody (OtherBill?) please look through that stuff and make
> sure we can't make some of the char *'s const char *'s?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Ryan
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
___
> Ryan Bloom                        rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message