httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: simple HTTP/1.0 request strace
Date Sun, 07 Jan 2001 20:41:07 GMT
I know what you mean about the reply-to...it keeps catching me out as well
:)

We'll take it to dev@apr...

david
----- Original Message -----
From: "dean gaudet" <dgaudet-list-new-httpd@arctic.org>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: simple HTTP/1.0 request strace


> yup i'm on dev@apr ... it's just that this seemed to be cross-post
> material and i don't have a single email address that's able to post to
> both lists :)  plus with the Reply-To it makes crossposting... difficult.
> so i decided i'd just be stodgy and post here :)
>
> -dean
>
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, David Reid wrote:
>
> > > the {get,set}sockopt stuff is TCP_NODELAY and CORK.  those aren't
terribly
> > > expensive system calls at all... but it's still tempting to clean them
up.
> > > i'd say that since all sockopt calls go through APR it can keep track
> > > of the current state -- it could even defer setting TCP_NODELAY until
> > > a naked write comes along (i.e. a write which isn't part of a sendfile
> > > sequence which uses CORK).
> >
> > There is a note along those lines in the the code for os_cork()...
> >
> > Are you on the APR list as we should discuss how to implement it there
> > really ;)
> >
> > Nice to see you're back!
> >
> > david
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message