httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject RE: My first fix for APACHE2.0
Date Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:56:36 GMT
Why is this an issue?

If you are looking for a detection 'feature', we should be implementing
an APR_HAS_BASE64 symbol, not testing if we included a header that we
can include with, or without, the feature compiled in.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jfclere@vtxrm2.siemens.es [mailto:jfclere@vtxrm2.siemens.es]On
> Behalf Of jean-frederic clere
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:01 AM
> To: Martin Kraemer
> Subject: My first fix for APACHE2.0
> 
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> Well I think I have a problem the APACHE_AP is wrong in a apr_ file...
> The fix is the following:
> +++
> Index: apr_base64.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apache/apr-util/include/apr_base64.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.13
> diff -u -r1.13 apr_base64.h
> --- apr_base64.h        2001/01/19 07:01:26     1.13
> +++ apr_base64.h        2001/01/23 14:50:49
> @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
>   * Tsirigotis <panos@alumni.cs.colorado.edu> for xinetd.
>   */
>  
> -#ifndef APACHE_BASE64_H
> -#define APACHE_BASE64_H
> +#ifndef APR_BASE64_H
> +#define APR_BASE64_H
>  
>  #include "apu.h"
>  #include "apr_general.h"
> @@ -146,4 +146,4 @@
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -#endif /* !APACHE_BASE64_H */
> +#endif /* !APR_BASE64_H
> */                                                     
> +++
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Jean-frederic
> 

Mime
View raw message