Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 45632 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2000 05:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 45618 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2000 05:06:28 -0000 From: TOKILEY@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:06:00 EST Subject: Re: [Win32] 1.3.15; my mod_foo.dll question on the table To: new-httpd@apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 86 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N In a message dated 00-12-19 21:31:45 EST, Greg Stein wrote... > -1 on using a suffix other than .DLL. That is just wrong for the platform. The .DLL suffix has never been any kind of 'official' standard. A DLL is what is IS... it doesn't matter what it is CALLED. Naming a Win32 DLL something other than .DLL is no more 'wrong for the platform than naming a text file 'mystuff' instead of 'mystuff.txt'. Yours... Kevin Kiley