Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 9315 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2000 16:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 9200 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 16:17:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:20:03 -0800 (PST) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj To: Apache Developers Subject: Re: FYI -- Apache 2.0 status update from 27 dec 2000 In-Reply-To: <3A4B6341.EC2A6B7C@Golux.Com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h29.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just to mention this on-list, because I am not sure it has every been mentioned before. Many of the patches from Mike Abbot do not improve performance on all machines. I have had a couple of conversations about looking at those patches with some of the other developers, and the general consensus seems to be that there is probably some advantage to using some of the patches, but figuring out which patches are useful on all platforms will take some time. Ryan On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Acked. > -- > #ken P-)} > > Ken Coar > Apache Software Foundation > "Apache Server for Dummies" > "Apache Server Unleashed" _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------