Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 08:25:03 -0800 (PST)
From: rbb@covalent.net
To: new-httpd@apache.org
cc: apr@dev.apache.org
Subject: Re: Showstoppers: Alpha 9
In-Reply-To: <001401c0638d$422874a0$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012110821580.1298-100000@koj.rkbloom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


> 1. is sdbm an -internally- packaged function, as is mm?  (my 2c says yes)
>    If so, it has no business being distributed in httpd-2.0/include/apr-util,
>    since we certainly wouldn't distribute mm.h either.  Same goes with
>    apu_config.h and apu_private.h.  This means they don't belong in
>    apr-util/include either.

I have to agree with OtherBill here.  SDBM should be an internal
package.  We have already admitted that it is only to be used as a
last-resort package.

> 2. aprs are driving me nuts.  Either we use src/ folders around the sources,
>    or we don't.  Consistency is all I'm asking.

Personally, -0 for using src.  

> I'll fix either if we agree on how, but I would end up breaking the build.
> Perhaps someone on Unix/libtool could do so, and I'll clean up the win32 asap.

If we agree on any of this, I'll fix the Unix builds.

Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------