Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 67009 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2000 15:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 66935 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2000 15:46:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:49:17 -0800 (PST) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj.rkbloom.net To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 Makefile.in In-Reply-To: <20001207234325.I27505@lyra.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > @test -d $(includedir)/xml || $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(includedir)/xml > > + @test -d $(includedir)/pcre || $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(includedir)/pcre > > @test -d $(includedir)/apr || $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(includedir)/apr > > + @test -d $(includedir)/apr-util || $(MKINSTALLDIRS) $(includedir)/apr-util > > [ unrelated to this particular change ] > > If we publish stuff to .../apr and .../pcre and whatnot, then modules will > need to do one of two things: > > 1) refer to them as "apr/apr_pools.h" > or > 2) add the subdirs to the include path and include "apr_pools.h" > > The problem is that (1) isn't compatible with the module also being > buildable within the Apache tree. If we suggest (2) for third-party modules, > then they're going to have to add every subdir that we ever add in the > future. (i.e. it doesn't seem to scale well) > > I don't have any immediate ideas... > > Thoughts? I just copied what was there already, but I thought it was a bit hokey. I would personally like to remove the directories all together, and put everything in one place. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------