Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 72469 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2000 01:33:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 72416 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2000 01:33:58 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: front.linuxcare.com.au: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be sanguine.linuxcare.com.au Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:33:52 +1100 From: Martin Pool To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: mod_log_config: Cookie logging patch 1.3.X Message-ID: <20001208123352.C23249@linuxcare.com.au> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: <20001207104538.D22151@linuxcare.com.au> <20001207115258.E22151@linuxcare.com.au> <20001207051957.Q27235@lyra.org> <20001208103828.L22151@linuxcare.com.au> <20001207164513.B27235@lyra.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001207164513.B27235@lyra.org>; from gstein@lyra.org on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 04:45:13PM -0800 X-GPG: 1024D/A0B3E88B: AFAC578F 1841EE6B FD95E143 3C63CA3F A0B3E88B X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 7 Dec 2000, Greg Stein wrote: > I'm -0 on adding features to 1.3 with or without the token stuff. Considering the large changes, my sense that it will be late in the new year before the majority of sites have migrated to 2.0. I can understand (at least some of) the engineering reasons to keep 1.3 stabilized, and to put effort into 2.0. But at the same time it seems a little kind of cruel to not do anything new for people still using 1.3. Would it help if I made a parallel patch to 2.0? (Assuming this feature is not already there.) -- Martin Pool, Linuxcare, Inc. +61 2 6262 8990 mbp@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.