httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: Showstoppers: Alpha 9
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:25:03 GMT

> 1. is sdbm an -internally- packaged function, as is mm?  (my 2c says yes)
>    If so, it has no business being distributed in httpd-2.0/include/apr-util,
>    since we certainly wouldn't distribute mm.h either.  Same goes with
>    apu_config.h and apu_private.h.  This means they don't belong in
>    apr-util/include either.

I have to agree with OtherBill here.  SDBM should be an internal
package.  We have already admitted that it is only to be used as a
last-resort package.

> 2. aprs are driving me nuts.  Either we use src/ folders around the sources,
>    or we don't.  Consistency is all I'm asking.

Personally, -0 for using src.  

> I'll fix either if we agree on how, but I would end up breaking the build.
> Perhaps someone on Unix/libtool could do so, and I'll clean up the win32 asap.

If we agree on any of this, I'll fix the Unix builds.

Ryan Bloom               
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131

View raw message