httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Laurie <...@algroup.co.uk>
Subject Re: Order of handlers
Date Sun, 31 Dec 2000 14:09:45 GMT
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> 
> > From: Ben Laurie [mailto:ben@algroup.co.uk]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 7:04 AM
> >
> > Anyway, I propose that, like hooks, handlers should be able to specify
> > their relative order, when they feel like it. And I think I'm
> > volunteering to make the change :-)
> 
> Do you plan to provide an 'override' such that module authors, especially,
> can force a reorg?

I don't understand what you mean by this.

>  Heck, maybe an .html on "Why does Apache order modules
> thusly, and where should I stick my module?"

I'm trying to eliminate the need to answer that question...

> > What say you?
> 
> I know this has been discussed, but I don't remember the conclusion?
> If there is an override, I'm +1 :-)  I'd rather see ordinal control of
> the load order rather than position dependence anyways, seeing as we
> have this huge problem of multiple .confs in the httpd.d directory
> feature.  It would be nice to say "Apache 2.0 is simpler and safer to use."

Quite so.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

Mime
View raw message