Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 16468 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2000 08:17:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 16443 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2000 08:17:38 -0000 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 08:16:48 +0000 From: Joe Orton To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: general/6711: byterange problems in 1.3.14 Message-ID: <20001101081648.B1066@light.plus.com> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: <20001101001706.G16227@hand.dotat.at> <003801c043a0$b0709350$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> <20001101015620.C18414@hand.dotat.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001101015620.C18414@hand.dotat.at>; from dot@dotat.at on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 01:56:20AM +0000 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 01:56:20AM +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > OK, I'll commit it if Greg/Joe or anyone else thinks my patch is > right. I'm still at a loss regarding the actual problem, though, and I > have caught some dread lurgy (probably on the plane) so I'm having > trouble thinking at the moment. I'd say back out my original patch, it's causing far more trouble than it's worth. joe