Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 16985 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2000 04:20:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 16974 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2000 04:20:58 -0000 Errors-To: From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: Subject: RE: [PATCH] bucket split compromise (Was RE: Implementing split()on pipe buckets?) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 22:20:54 -0600 Message-ID: <000c01c04d29$1e940970$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net] > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 10:17 PM > > +1 for all the docs changes. > > +1 for the split function, -1 for putting it into ap_buckets.c. Until > this code is actually put into the buckets themselves (I > disagree that it should), this code belongs in util_filter.c. +1 here too. And I'd suggest we start an ap_buckets_util.c for these sorts of accessors that would otherwise polute the buckets themselves (making them non-atomic) but don't do anything but provide bucket utility functions.