httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@covalent.net
Subject Re: APR_LOCAL/APR_REMOTE
Date Mon, 06 Nov 2000 19:23:23 GMT
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, David Reid wrote:

> Port is a short, but I think it makes sense to have a type so that we know
> we're passing a port.  Just seems to make things cleaner...

I guess.  Personally I dislike the proliferation of types, because
whenever I see a new type, I also have to look it up to see what it
actually resolves to.

Ryan

> 
> david
> 
> > > Whilst I'm at it I'd like at add apr_port_t... :)
> >
> > Why?  Does IPv6 use a different definition for a port than an unsigned 32
> > bit integer?
> >
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message