Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 14280 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2000 19:33:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 14166 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2000 19:33:35 -0000 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [addt'n] Unicode URL encoding References: <003501c02efd$e3d47890$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> From: Jeff Trawick Date: 05 Oct 2000 15:28:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: "William A. Rowe, Jr."'s message of "Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:55:53 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "William A. Rowe, Jr." writes: > Sorry I never trimmed the first reply :-( > > My only concern with the most fundimental translation to this new > scheme I propose is that we have the additional setup for what will > be very, very frequent invocations. That's why I tuned the thing > (how well I haven't decided). Every call to apr_open, every file > stat, etc on win32 will need this function. > > Agreed that we can change args, but I don't want to be comparing > strings to get at these two fundemental character sets. But we don't need to apr_xlate_open every time... Do that once at initialization and keep the xlate handle accessible... -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@ibm.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...