Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 83011 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2000 14:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 82995 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2000 14:53:44 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: koj: rbb owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: BOF: canonical names In-Reply-To: <000501c03912$cd339c00$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Can we look at this during the hack-a-thon? If not, I'm up for a BOF. Ryan On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Folks, > > who is game for a BOF session on the parsing of the filesystem > and reorganization of the canonical API? Although I truly hope > I get these moved cleanly to APR this week before I fly, it's an > entire rearrangement. I'm still feeling the time is now, before > 2.0 goes out, to do this right. The change may be to radical to > consider a 2.0.1 or even a 2.1. I expect we keep the flow the > same, but what it does and what we suggest to (demand of) modules > authors for best practices will be affected. I'd like to see it > hacked then and there, so OS2, NW and oddball Unix implementations > are especially welcome at this table. > > Bill > _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------