Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 92618 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2000 15:29:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 92586 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2000 15:29:51 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: koj: rbb owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:30:49 -0700 (PDT) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj To: "new-httpd@apache.org" , Brian Havard Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/helpers .cvsignore config.guess config.sub In-Reply-To: <200010091321.AAA11225@silk.apana.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >Ummm, no I don't think so... Those versions have some private (to > >APR) changes which aren't present in other copies of config.sub and > >config.guess. Where would buildconf get them? From the autoconf or > >libtool installation? > > Yes, they're copied from /usr/local/share/autoconf/ on my system during the > configuration process, at least for me they are. If I'm the only one then > sure, I'll resurect them. The problem is which config.sub and config.guess we are talking about. APR's should remain in the tree, because they are not copied with buildconf. Apache's should be removed from the tree, because they are copied (or links created) by buildconf. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------