Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 75358 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2000 17:36:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 75317 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2000 17:36:49 -0000 From: TOKILEY@aol.com Message-ID: <26.c9d7373.272f0b91@aol.com> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:36:17 EST Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src CHANGES To: new-httpd@apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 86 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N In a message dated 00-10-30 11:12:36 EST, Ryan writes. > I am still -1 for including this module in the base distribution unless > somebody can provide a really good reason for distributing it. Because I think there is a base-level expectation that the best place to get things FOR Apache is FROM Apache. If there are a ton of 'useful' modules for Apache that are KNOWN to work then what is the big deal with at least providing a distribution that has all these 'goodies' in it? You can call the directory where they are installed '/try/these/at/your/own/risk/" or "/we/don't/really/maintain/these/goodies/but/here/they/are" if you really want to, people won't care... they just might think it's nice to get Apache products FROM Apache. It's a base-level expectation these days. Yours... Kevin Kiley