httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <trawi...@bellsouth.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] merging AddOutputFilter directives
Date Tue, 03 Oct 2000 19:42:34 GMT
rbb@covalent.net writes:

> I kind of disagree with this.  I would much prefer to see a remove filter
> directive analogous to the RemoveHandler directive.  I think this is more
> in line with what we do for handlers, so it makes a bit more sense in my
> mind.
> 
> Just an opinion though.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 
> > The following patch requires that the full list of filters be
> > specified on each AddOutputFilter; no such appending is done.  Thus,
> > a different order or different set of filters can be specified.  (The
> > patch doesn't take care of the fact that you can't get rid of the darn
> > filter list.  Perhaps we need to allow something like "AddOutputFilter
> > None" or "NoOutputFilter" or something else to do the job?)
> > 

RemoveHandler is not strictly analogous to a filter list because
RemoveHandler removes something from an unordered list.

Maybe AddOutputFilter should be SetOutputFilters (which acts the way I
want :) )?

Does anybody else have any opinion on this?

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@ibm.net | PGP public key at web site:
     http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
          Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Mime
View raw message