Return-Path: 
 <new-httpd-return-7791-apmail-new-httpd-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 42117 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2000 06:19:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
list-help: <mailto:new-httpd-help@apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:new-httpd-unsubscribe@apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:new-httpd@apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org
Received: (qmail 42105 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2000 06:19:17 -0000
X-Authentication-Warning: escher.vanzoest.com: sander owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 23:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sander van Zoest <sander@covalent.net>
X-Sender: sander@escher.vanzoest.com
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: RE: Mailing List Archive
In-Reply-To: <000401c01c7e$65cf8610$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009112302310.326-100000@escher.vanzoest.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

First off, let me say that I am *not* a graphic artist/designer *grin*,

> Ahmmm... the message font is too small (at least for me, in
> courier no less ;-@

Courier is because I am using <pre> tags right now, since I didn't
have the time to get spacing going.  I have bumped the font up.

> Would be good if the message id's were in the list, as well, since 
> we key on message id in the status files, et. al.  

That one is pretty easy to add. Done! ;-)

> And please, don't fix frame widths (some of us like working at 
> 1600x1200, others expect to get away with 400x200.)

True, I have updated the table widths for the messages to 100%. 
Granted this doesn't help too much right now, since we are still
using <pre> tags. Indexes might get overalled later.
  
> Just an aside... I didn't see a search or the antique
> archives (which are useful, I go back to '99s messages at
> least once a month.)  Are these planned for the near future?

I definately would like to see this. Remember that this is a
first release *grin*, and there are many things people (including myself)
would like to see for future revisions.
  
> But hey, everyone's a critic :-) 

As long as the feedback is constructive, then it is always appreciated.

--
Sander van Zoest                                         [sander@covalent.net]
Covalent Technologies, Inc.                           http://www.covalent.net/
(415) 536-5218                                 http://www.vanzoest.com/sander/