Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98273 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2000 17:01:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 65272 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2000 00:41:17 -0000 Message-ID: <39D3E522.807CFF69@platypus.bc.ca> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 20:41:06 -0400 From: Bishop X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: More on PR#6397 References: <004001c02974$c000ffd0$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com] > > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:20 AM > > > > Of course, the patch as supplied will need to be updated and changed. > > We don't currently use scandir() or dirents (IIRC) so it's a > > portability concern... Still, I'm willing to handle those if it gets > > enough votes. > > Consider me +1 with the same reservations before it is committed. > > Noted the alpha sort - very good, but need to use readdir and > then sort it, not elegant, but at least it's a one shot. Call it > httpd.d by default and I'm happy, plus port this for 2.0 before > mid-October. I'm mostly on track with ya, Bill, except for the last part. What'm I to label as httpd.d? - bish