Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Message-ID: <39B51558.2E480A5B@Golux.Com>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 11:46:32 -0400
From: Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com>
Organization: The Apache Software Foundation
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/main http_core.c  
 http_protocol.cutil_filter.c
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009050801300.30450-100000@koj.covalent.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> 
> > > The explanation of "this is how we designed it", when at least
> > > two people are saying the design is wrong, is not a valid veto.
> >
> > Yes, it is.  The proper response is to post a correction to the
> > design, not patches to the code.
> 
> The changes to the design were posted.  I posed design changes, and a
> patch one day, and then an updated patch the next day.

And if there wasn't consensus that the design changes were correct
and acceptable, they don't take effect automatically.
-- 
#ken    P-)}

Ken Coar                    <http://Golux.Com/coar/>
Apache Software Foundation  <http://www.apache.org/>
"Apache Server for Dummies" <http://Apache-Server.Com/>
"Apache Server Unleashed"   <http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/>