Return-Path: 
 <new-httpd-return-7956-apmail-new-httpd-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 66490 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2000 12:04:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
list-help: <mailto:new-httpd-help@apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:new-httpd-unsubscribe@apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:new-httpd@apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org
Received: (qmail 66477 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2000 12:04:26 -0000
Message-ID: <009801c02168$296ae2c0$0a1aa8c0@jetnet.co.uk>
From: "David Reid" <dreid@jetnet.co.uk>
To: "Apache \(new-httpd\)" <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: Apache 2.0 & FreeBSD 4
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:01:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Has anyone else had problems with performance with this combination?  I'm
seeing some really low results using ab from 1.3.12 and even worse from ab
in Apache 2.0 (which has been suggested before doesn't work well so I'm not
overly worried).

david

"I try never to get involved in my own life,
it's way too complicated."

http://www.david-reid.com