"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
>
> OS/390 has a Pthread API, but not pthread_key_delete()? Err.. then this has
> to mean that OS/390 has a Pthread library based on an anchient Pthread draft
> version, right? Because AFAIK pthread_key_delete() is a non-optional part of
> Pthreads.
Yes, that appears to be true. I think pthread support was rushed into
OS/390 Unix while the standards were still in a state of flux because
OS/390 processes are heavy. We have seen a few other cases where the
pthread APIs don't match the current standards.
Greg
|