Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 4774 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2000 19:28:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 4757 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2000 19:28:37 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: koj.rkbloom.net: rbb owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:33:30 -0700 (PDT) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj.rkbloom.net To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ap_add_filter In-Reply-To: <399D89AA.90857C59@Golux.Com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: > > > > This is where we disagree. I feel the insert_filter is very useful. > > I have a very bad feeling about allowing modules to modify the > filter chain from whatever was derived from the config file > settings. Are you suggesting that a PHP script should be able > to say "run my output through mod_include"? Yes, we are saying that modules will be able to redirect their output to other modules. Maybe we want to have a way to turn that off, but we definately want to allow a module to say, "I am outputting foobar, so it better run through the foobar filter." Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------