Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 67714 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2000 08:33:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 67702 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2000 08:33:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 01:32:21 -0700 From: Manoj Kasichainula To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Naming Message-ID: <20000823013221.C1699@manojk.users.mindspring.com> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: <200008230038.RAA40968@trudge.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.7i In-Reply-To: <200008230038.RAA40968@trudge.engr.sgi.com>; from mja@trudge.engr.sgi.com on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:38:29PM -0700 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 05:38:29PM -0700, Mike Abbott wrote: > Recent Apache/2.0 alpha tarballs use varying directory name styles which > makes supplying patches harder. Just a tiny bit harder but it's easy to > confuse some folks. Can we pick one and stick with it please? +1, but you could just tell people to cd into the source directory and patch -p1, perhaps.