Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 90576 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2000 21:40:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 90527 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2000 21:40:14 -0000 Message-ID: <000e01c00edd$cb6ea040$e4421b09@raleigh.ibm.com> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: References: Subject: Re: AP_FTYPE_CONNECTION == BUFF + IOLs Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:45:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Cool! > > > > The message that started this thread had nothing to do with the IOL > > > removal. It had to do with why we are trying to use filters to > > repalce > > > IOLs and BUFFs. While the two are related, they are not the same. > > > > I am really interested to see how mod_cgi is implemented using filters > > and BBs. In the meantime, I am taking a break from Apache development on > > Windows for a while .... > > I should mention that this is working right now. I am having a minor > problem with seg faulting on interpreted scripts (it doesn't seg fault on > compiled code though), and a timing issue still to be resolved, but > mod_cgi should have buckets committed by end of day today. > > Ryan > > ________________________________________________________________________ _______ > Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org > 406 29th St. > San Francisco, CA 94131 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- > > >