httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@apache.org>
Subject RE: XBitHack.
Date Mon, 07 Aug 2000 23:41:36 GMT
I think the main reason not to do that is that it would change the URL and
thus invalidate search engine links.  Although a redirect would of course
fix that.

-Rasmus

> Ah, but as I reread your message, I see that your view was to force parsing
> of certain files. Why not just define a separate time. .shtml?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Slemko [mailto:marcs@znep.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 4:26 PM
> > To: new-httpd@apache.org
> > Subject: Re: XBitHack.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can we remove this option for 2.0?  I can't even figure out why we need
> > > it.  Dirk seems to think it is because of mime types from the very early
> > > days of Apache.
> >
> > Is there a replacement for the group execute bit feature?
> >
> > In reality, the biggest reason not to make all your .html pages get parsed
> > by mod_include has nothing to do with server resource use on 99.9% of the
> > servers, and everything to do with cachability.
> >
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message