httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: ap_ vs apr_
Date Tue, 01 Aug 2000 14:10:18 GMT

> But, I think it's a bad thing to have all these functions changing
> names every few months on a whim.

This wasn't a whim.  Doug tried to do something that the old design
wouldn't allow.  The solution was either try to hack around it or fix the
underlying problem.

> > % ls -l diff.txt 
> > -rw-r--r--   1 dougm    users     1249609 Aug  1 00:06 diff.txt
> > 
> > so, one last chance for anyone to veto this change, otherwise i'll commit
> > late tommorrow night.
> -1 (with no veto, though I did consider it), for the reason I stated
> above. I'd prefer to see someone who was pro-ap_ say that he has
> changed his mind; otherwise we're just switching because certain
> people aren't paying attention at the moment.

I think we are switching because we found a situation where the old
solution fell down.


Ryan Bloom               
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131

View raw message