On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Randy Terbush wrote:
> Ah, but as I reread your message, I see that your view was to force parsing
> of certain files. Why not just define a separate time. .shtml?
No, reread it again.
There are two separate issues there. The first is the group execute
bit. From the docs:
As for on but also test the group-execute bit. If it is set,
then set the Last-modified date of the returned file to be the
last modified time of the file. If it is not set, then no
last-modified date is sent. Setting this bit allows clients
and proxies to cache the result of the request.
I am not aware of any other supported way to get this sort of functionality.
Then my other statement was a response to the "but we don't want to have
to change the names question" that hadn't been asked but is standard fare.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Slemko [mailto:marcs@znep.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 4:26 PM
> > To: new-httpd@apache.org
> > Subject: Re: XBitHack.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can we remove this option for 2.0? I can't even figure out why we need
> > > it. Dirk seems to think it is because of mime types from the very early
> > > days of Apache.
> >
> > Is there a replacement for the group execute bit feature?
> >
> > In reality, the biggest reason not to make all your .html pages get parsed
> > by mod_include has nothing to do with server resource use on 99.9% of the
> > servers, and everything to do with cachability.
> >
>
|