httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tony Finch <...@dotat.at>
Subject Re: ap_ vs apr_
Date Tue, 01 Aug 2000 17:04:19 GMT
Manoj Kasichainula <manoj@io.com> wrote:
>
>The basic reason that I remember for sticking with ap_ what that it
>reduced confusion; you don't have to remember whether a function was
>an ap_ or an apr_ function. Also, the namespaces shouldn't be
>seperate, because it would get very confusing to have both ap_blah and
>apr_blah in the source tree.

That can easily be avoided so I consider it to be a non-problem.

Tony.
-- 
en oeccget g mtcaa    f.a.n.finch
v spdlkishrhtewe y    dot@dotat.at
eatp o v eiti i d.    fanf@covalent.net

Mime
View raw message