httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com>
Subject Re: ap_ vs apr_
Date Tue, 01 Aug 2000 16:21:00 GMT
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 07:10:18AM -0700, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> 
> > But, I think it's a bad thing to have all these functions changing
> > names every few months on a whim.
> 
> This wasn't a whim.  Doug tried to do something that the old design
> wouldn't allow.  The solution was either try to hack around it or fix the
> underlying problem.

At the end, though, I thought I sensed him conceding that the what he
wanted to do was kind of weird, but maybe not.

That's why I didn't veto :) But I'm worried that someone who was
against apr_* before will show up in a couple of days and veto it.


Mime
View raw message