Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 69955 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2000 22:16:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 69939 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2000 22:16:52 -0000 Message-ID: <397F6375.D09A7BE7@algroup.co.uk> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:17:25 +0100 From: Ben Laurie Organization: A.L. Group plc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: ap_ vs apr_ References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N rbb@covalent.net wrote: > > Well, I've voted on this before, but +1 to change the APR prefix to apr_ +1 Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html Coming to ApacheCon Europe 2000? http://apachecon.com/