Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 45293 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2000 01:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 45275 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 01:50:26 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:52:43 -0700 From: Greg Stein To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: make depend. Message-ID: <20000707185243.Q29590@lyra.org> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from sascha@schumann.cx on Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 07:49:02PM +0200 X-URL: http://www.lyra.org/greg/ On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 07:49:02PM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote: >... > > > - avoids maintenance overhead > > > > I don't think it is a high overhead. Once in a while, run make depend;cvs > > commit on a new tree. We could automate that if we really needed > > to. This was never an issue for 1.3 > > I don't see the point of storing anything in the CVS which > can be easily regenerated. I'm with Sascha on this one. We made a call a while back to *not* include generated output in our CVS tree. The dependencies are one of those, so they can/should stay out of the tree. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/