Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 81067 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2000 15:19:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 80994 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2000 15:18:58 -0000 Message-ID: <029801bfe694$595eb330$0a1aa8c0@jetnet.co.uk> From: "David Reid" To: References: Subject: Re: [PATCH] revised, final filtering patch. (ready for review) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:18:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I don't really understand it either. Does anyone? Off to Genoa... david > Why this incredible rush ? If we are in a rush to get 2.0 out; then we can > always do it without filtering ? Doing filtering according to your design > in 2.0 would lead to a 2.1 or 3.0 rather soon I fear ? Or is this > something the group wants ?